These are exotic and exciting sets of experiments examining the capacities of the human mind.

For each of these experiment types, a meta-examination of ALL studies performed, both in favor and against, find six-sigma evidence, or beyond a billion to one against chance.

Now some hard-headed skeptic will say statistics can be manipulated – but again, you can achieve these datapoints for yourself.

Eventually all of this becomes casual, normal – every 10 minutes or so to the full initaited adept.

Remote Viewing

To begin we’ll take Remote Viewing – the human mind’s ability to perceive from afar – like the photons observed to ‘know information’ from far away.

Remote Viewing is seeing in your mind’s eye what is occurring far away. Is this possible? HARD YES.

At first thought, you may conjure a set of Russian twins, the first in Room A and the other in Room B looking at a cactus – and twin A draws rather perfectly the cactus that twin B is viewing.

Evidence shows even ordinary people can do this with decent precision, although there are assuredly experts (and the CIA has even released many papers of their own research, if this can be believed as true [debatable]. Note, the CIAs papers include remote viewing into historic happenings on Mars, which congeal with channeled material.)

We must mention an extraordinary element which is: experiments have shown remote viewing to be equally possible when performed in the past or future, meaning one could perform remote viewing on a cactus drawn last century, or next April.

In a real study, you’d need exquisite controls to prove this correctly, and researchers have achieved this rather systematically and convincingly (in many cases).

Telepathy

The abliity to read minds is also at six-sigma statistics mathematically, as all of these fish-that-fly are.

And so is Precogntition, the abliity to predict the future.

Neither of these require much explanation.

Force of Will

Now as game-changing as all the above is – our ability to perceive information across time and space – it’s about to get more powerful, shamanistic, and wild. The fish-that-fly will become invisible. ‘The Universe’ revealed more clearly.

ALL BEHOLD SEVERUS SNAPE!

What we encounter here with Force of Will studies is that the actual energy-environment-unfoldment is shifted via our innards/intentions.

That we can shape it – the actual happening of the ‘physical’ unfolding itself.

Now this is the edge of far-out, and yet this is already hard science.

Consider at first that this is actually quite sensible, rather natural if supposing the root miracle of consciousness gives rise to the energy manifestation in form. In which case the heartbeat, or the prime motor, is the insides, i.e the root miracle – the I-AM-ENGINE, or eternal play is the first miracle – the egg, not the chicken.

And that there – on the insides – portions of our being, do, in fact, reside, and even drive. You and me – part of the engine of the place – mini-creators in training, eh?

And that portion is shaping our reality. (Creator)

Now we’d want evidence to believe this!

And already, (so sweet it is to be in century 21!), the hard sciences have delivered an enticing heap of evidence, and as always, it can be proven true in one’s experience.

Now, a good starter in this direction is the set of studies under Remote Healing – or studies where people pray or do energy work for people in a hospital, who don’t even know it’s happening, and they observably get better. Note – this is not at six sigma status yet, this particular aspect, I don’t believe. But some studies show it to work, regardless of the faith of the person praying. And interestingly – for negative studies – would an experiment designed to bet against this, already have a layer of intention for it not to work? [If we are saying, intention works.]

The biggest set of science we are bringing to bear hear though is under the term Force Of Will, which means that people’s will or intent or interiors apply a real, measurable force on physical outcomes.

A huge example set is measured outcomes in Random Number Generators (RNGs), or machines that generate random numbers, which scientists have placed all over the world and observed for disturbances in behavior.

In heaps of data, it has been shown that our collective force of will, or our emotions and spiritual intent, do affect the behavior of these machines. For instance, on September 11, 2001, the machines went haywire all over the world, due to the collective charge in the air.

Notably, when they place these machines outside a spiritual event or a music concert – they see results. But they do not see results outside of most business conferences: the effect seems to require an inner charge, a certain electricity of spirit, emotion.

Note – ideally we would do business in a charged way, too – and perhaps many are… but lecture-ville, does not appear to tip the scales.

Another data set exists on electrons hitting a splitter and randomly going left or right. Then, add a little spice and introduce Human attention or Force of Will to measure if it can change the outcome of the process: if we intend for the electron to split left, is there a shift in what happens?

Ever so slightly – yes.

Fun facts: two people produce a stronger impact than a single person alone, especially if the two share an emotional bond. And women have a slightly stronger effect than men, generally. (Note! I believe this is because the feminine energy goes inwards, where the motor is). (Also note that generally men have ‘an advantage at physical reality’ in the sense of say sports, and here we are seeing that generally women have ‘an advantage at spiritual reality’). (Yin or feminine being the inward force, and Yang or masculine being the outward force. WE ALL BALANCE BOTH.) [THESE ARE GROSS STATEMENTS JUST TO ILLUCIDATE THE NATURE OF ROOT FORCES].

There are similar experiments where they add the variable of past and future: where an intention is set in the past or future – meaning, the intention was set in the past or future of the actual event or outcome. And still it worked!

Meaning, I could intent for an electron to go left in the past, and it would actually affect the process.

Oddly the more you know about the fish-that-fly, the less this is surprising.

There is a page at the end of this course with resources: books and articles with links to studies.

Note – we will find we can go much further with our personal sciences, and so we shall.

In Crossing the Bridge I discuss what I have found in my decade long endeavor in this direction.